Comments on: Beal’s Conjecture

By: Arnie Dris

Arnie Dris — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:53:38 +0000

Hi Delu, Hi Greg,

Any news on the submitted proof?

By: Delu V.

Delu V. — Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:28:57 +0000

Hi,
I have the proof you need,a paradox in fact.The manuscript has been submitted.As is usual you would have to maintain discretion on the paper till after the journal has peer- reviewed and published it.It is available immediately on an email request if you could do me a simple request.
Nice day.
Regards,
Delu

By: Greg R

Greg R — Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:51:40 +0000

Doh…so much for my SUP tags.

In any case, I think you meant that 2^4 = 4^2.

By: Greg R

Greg R — Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:50:21 +0000

“… due to the fact that 23 = 42, etc.”

Or 24 = 42, even. ;-) (Unless your statement was mod 2, 4 or 8, I guess.)

By: jeet

jeet — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 04:18:05 +0000

Hi,
Why are the number of candidates less for a N = large prime as opposed to N= large number? Also I need to cite your work. Can you provide me with required information?

By: danvk.org » Beal’s Conjecture

danvk.org » Beal’s Conjecture — Fri, 25 May 2007 04:49:57 +0000

[...] put a link to last summer’s work on Beal’s Conjecture over on the right-hand side of the site. A quick [...]